"The underlying problem with the current law is that the courts are being used to conceal the truth," Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming wrote in an email to Reuters. Hemming is compiling a report on super injunctions.
"I know of a number of cases where the truth that is being concealed involves serious misbehaviour by the authorities rather than the peccadilloes of celebrities. That is where there is a real danger in the current position," he added.
When John Hemmings MP correctly states the above he could be speaking directly about the "Justice 4 Linda Lewis" campaign.
We have seen it with our own eyes.
In October 2009 at Cardiff Civil Court in front of Judge Seys-Llewellyn we proved that Neath and Port Talbot County Borough Council had acted illegally in removing Linda's daughter from her hospital bed at gunpoint in 1998.
We proved that there was no valid or legal paperwork ever issued authorising the return of Linda's daughter.
We proved that Miss Lewis' daughter was returned to the UK on a "false and fraudulent " passport.
So much so in fact that the barrister representing the local authority Miss Sutton desperately wanted to disbar herself after deliberately producing false and fraudulent evidence into court. Such was the deceit that was allowed to go on in those proceedings.
Remarkably Miss Sutton was told to stay where she was by Judge Seys-LLewellyn as in his words " I know which way this case will go." long before all our evidence had been submitted.
The outcome was known from the beginning.
This was merely a showtrial. A kangaroo court.
I should also point out that 5 Councillors, 4 from Neath and Port Talbot County Borough Council and myself were in court and prepared to testify that the local authority had acted illegally.
Even though all of us having signed "affidavits" to this effect we were not allowed to testify.
In a nutshell our testimony's were ignored.
Another point is that at this time Miss Lewis' daughter was aged 23, an adult and yet Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council Social Services continued to speak on her behalf.
Miss Lewis' daughter is now aged 25 and has still not been reunited with her loving and caring family.
These proceedings despite our many protestations were not held as they should have been in a "criminal court" but were held quite illegally under the "family court system" where deceit and illegality committed by bent judges and barristers can never be made public.
Therefore a "lifelong injunction" remains in place that prevents Miss Lewis from ever publishing the evidence that she has ( and now so do hundreds of others worldwide ) and placing it in the public domain.
Please note that the law states "no injunction can ever be issued to cover up a crime."
Several crimes has been committed in this case.
It was also during this court case that the " Spy catcher " law was introduced as an extra threat to prevent Miss Lewis and her team from releasing the evidence.
So desperate are they to prevent the evidence coming out and exposing the crimes that they have committed that "Spy catcher " laws have been introduced into a family court.
It is now well accepted by many people that "Spy catcher " has but one function in law.
It is there quite simply to protect a cover up !
By introducing "Spy catcher " into any case is an admission of guilt.
It is a desperate attempt by desperate people to stop the guilty who are protected by the state, bent judges and barristers from facing justice.
In Linda's case this is without doubt true but they cannot or will not be allowed to get away with it forever.
The truth will out very soon and so will all the evidence.
For more information and to watch the video. Click on.
Linda has asked me if you could all forward this article onto as many people as you know.