The Removal of Implied Access ( Above ) and Withdrawal of Consent ( Below) documents need to be amended with the persons own address and signed. Also the name of the relevant Local Authority needs to be entered. Also the figure of £10,000 can be changed should you wish to do so.
Also Included ( below ) is a document which covers your " Unalienable Rights " as a Human Being.
All three documents then need to be posted on the front door and gates of your property.
It is vital that all three documents are sent recorded or registered post ( for proof of delivery/signature ) to the following people.
1 - The Chief Of Police in the area.
2 - The Head of Legal Services at the Local Authority/Council
3 - The Head of Social Services at the Local Authority/Council.
If the parent has already been contacted by the SS and the names of said Social Workers are known then the three documents should also be sent registered/recorded delivery to these individuals as well.
When these documents are sent you should keep all receipts and take print out of signatures from the Post Office website which will also give you date and time of signature.
You have now started a Lawful trail that proves that the relevant people have been notified in advance of your intentions which should (theoretically) prevent any further visit to your property.
Should a visit occur you can use the proof of delivery signatures in your defence and question them being there.
It is vital to note that in my research and that of others many Police Officers ( operating under oath/Common Law ) hate having to accompany the SS because they generally regard them as scum and don't want to be involved.
The actions that you have taken by withdrawing consent and implied rights of access will prompt the Police Officers to leave with a smile on their face.
The role of the Police Officers is simple and that is to ensure that no " Breach of the peace takes place. "
It should be obvious based on your actions that the only crime now being committed is by that of the SS who are TRESPASSING on your property and are attempting to breach your Human Rights as stated.
For more case laws on Trespassing have a look at this link http://info.fmotl.com/RemovalOfAccessRights.htm
Although it is aimed at Bailiffs you can change Bailiffs to " Any Party " and the same case laws apply.
It is worth the victim taking several print outs of these case laws to quote to the SS and police should they be awkward and refuse to leave your property as they HAVE to.
Another important step to take although this can be difficult for many people is to involve as many friends, neighbours and family in your fight.
Ensure that as many of these turn up on your doorstep as possible should you be paid a visit.
They are witnesses to what you have said and will hopefully provide you with a sworn affidavit in your defence should you need it.
They have also known you for a long time and the same applies as to giving you excellent character references should the need arise.
Remember the SS will happily pay a psychiatrist or some other crank around £3000 to make up a favourable report on their behalf to entrap you often without ever having met you.
I think that more or less covers the logic behind this move.
Let's just hope it works.
The people I have run the idea past certainly think it has strong merit.
It is worth remembering that we are all not trained in law and cannot guarantee results but having some defence is better that having no defence at all.
Worth noting also (and please do spread this around) is that IF they ignore it & bring Police, there is a chance of Police attempting forced entry and if challenged they will incorrectly quote PACE Sec 17 1(e) as being 'concern for welfare'. What they get wrong is that particular section states 'life or limb risk' & 'concern for welfare' is NOT sufficient threshold for them to force entry (Syed v Director of Public Prosecutions  WLR (D) 1)
In other words, if you're faced with a potential forced entry, the officer must have good reason to suspect 'life or limb' risk, NOT simply 'concern for welfare' cos a social worker says so.
Also worth spreading around is that a SW cannot visit your children without your permission (at school, nursery etc which are not covered by the Implied Rights notice) unless they have evidence to suggest the child is at 'imminent risk of harm' as per Sec47 Childrens Act 1989 .
We hope that these small steps will help you.
Stay safe and God Bless the children
Feel free to leave a comment
Thanks also to Allison for input.
Could I please ask everyone reading this article to sign this petition