There was an error in this gadget

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

China correctly shows the rest of the world how to deal with "Evil Drug Dealers and Traffickers ! "


The Chinese government has shown the world how to deal with drug pushers by ignoring liberal bleating and executing convicted drug-smuggler Akmal Shaikh — a punishment which should be mandatory everywhere for that crime.

Mr Shaikh, who the media quite falsely claim to be a “British” man, was born in Pakistan in 1956. He moved to Britain in the 1960s and when he married a Hindu Indian, he insisted she convert to Islam before the marriage could take place.

Mr Shaikh and his family then lived in America during the 1980s (astonishing how Pakistani nationals appear to be able to glibly move between First World countries with no apparent immigration problems) but moved back to Britain when his estate agency went into bankruptcy.


He then started a minicab business in London but this also went insolvent.


Mr Shaikh was accused of sexual harassment by a former employee at the company, although it is unknown if this contributed to the insolvency.


He then divorced and moved to Poland, where he was resident before travelling to China to allegedly perform at a nightclub in Kyrgyzstan.


He was however arrested at Ürümqi Airport in September 2007 after a baggage search revealed he was carrying four kilograms (9 lb) of heroin. The Chinese criminal code provides the death penalty for smuggling heroin in quantities more than 50 grams (2 oz) and he was sentenced to death.


In his reaction, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said he was “appalled” by Mr Shaikh’s execution — a position which contrasts strongly with his lack of empathy for the hundreds of British lives lost as a result of his and the Tory-supported illegal and immoral wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.


In those wars, British servicemen and women have been murdered in the most horrendous ways: by being blown up, shot at with sniper rifles, killed by roadside bombs and in rare occasions, even tortured to death by Islamist fighters, some of whom come from Britain.

Mr Brown and the liberal elite seem more concerned however, about one drug-smuggling Pakistani in China then they do about the hundreds of British soldiers they have sent to die in their dirty wars, or even of the tens of thousands of British pensioners who have already died this winter because they are unable to pay their privatised and dramatically increased heating bills.

Once again, the Tory-Labour-Lib-Dem alliance and their media-cronies have demonstrated their total disregard for the interests of the indigenous population of Britain by placing more value on the life of a Third World criminal than on their own people.


The wheels of justice grind slowly, but grind they will, and one day this liberal elite will be called to account for their crimes against the British people.
Kevin

Sunday, 27 December 2009

New Labour are the real "Fascists and Nazi's ! " Here's the proof.

Ulrich Mühe playing East German Stasi Hauptmann Gerd Wiesler in the Oscar-winning The Lives of Others.

Telecom firms' fury at plan for 'Stasi' checks on every phone call and email.

Telecoms firms have accused the Government of acting like the East German Stasi over plans to force them to store the details of every phone call for at least a year.

Under the proposals, the details of every email sent and website visited will also be recorded to help the police and security services fight crime and terrorism.

But mobile phone companies have attacked the plans as a massive assault on privacy and warned it could be the first step towards a centralised ‘Big Brother’ database.

They have also told the Home Office that the scheme is deeply flawed.

The criticism of Britain’s growing ‘surveillance culture’ was made in a series of responses to an official consultation on the plans, which have been obtained by The Mail on Sunday.

T-Mobile said in its submission that it was a ‘particularly sensitive’ time as many people were commemorating the 20th anniversary of the protests that led to the collapse of ‘surveillance states in Eastern Europe.’

Martin Hopkins, head of data protection and disclosure, said: ‘It would be extremely ironic if we at T-Mobile (UK) Ltd had to acquire the surveillance functionality envisaged by the Consultation Document at the same time that our parent company, headquartered in Germany, was celebrating the 20th anniversary of the demise of the equivalent systems established by the Stasi in the federal states of the former East Germany.’

Equally trenchant was the response from Hutchinson 3G Uk Ltd, which read: ‘We take seriously the responsibility of safeguarding our customers’ information and data, and are unconvinced of the safeguards that the Government might make to protect against loss.’

The firm also said it had ‘substantial concerns’ over claims that public authorities would only be able to access data on a ‘case-by-case’ basis.
It is understood hundreds of public bodies and quangos may also be able to obtain information from the system.

‘It is our belief the safeguards listed in this consultation are incomplete and do not extend far enough,’ it added.

Orange and Vodafone were also highly critical.

Since October 2007, telecoms companies have been obliged to keep records for a year.
Under the new legislation, however, they will also be required to organise it better – for example, by grouping calls made by the same person.

Internet service providers have been required to hold records on emails and website visits since April.

Police and security services can already obtain such information if they are given permission by the courts.

The public will reimburse internet service providers and telecoms companies for the costs associated with storing the billions of records.

The activities of the Stasi, the former East Germany’s secret police, were memorably depicted in the Oscar-winning film The Lives Of Others, starring Ulrich Mühe. At the regime’s height, there were 200,000 agents and informers in a population of only 16million.





Britain's gone PC bonkers !


It is thought around 1.5m people play bingo in the UK every week.

A bingo caller has been advised to stop using phrases such as "two fat ladies" for fear of offending his audience.

John Sayers, who runs charity games in Sudbury, Suffolk, says he was told by a council clerk the traditional bingo call could upset some players.


Mr Sayers said no-one had complained before, but now players moaned his new numbers-only style was boring.


A town council spokeswoman said it was "sad" they had to give the advice but they had to be "politically correct".


The 75-year-old, a member of Sudbury Town Council and former town mayor, said the clerk advised him to cut the traditional comic calls in case the authority found itself facing legal action.

"The concern was that if there might be two large ladies in the audience when I said 'two fat ladies 88' or someone might think I was looking at their legs when I said 'legs 11'," he said.


"I was advised that someone might take offence and we could end up being taken to court."

A council spokeswoman told the East Anglian Daily Times: "In particular with John being a councillor we have to be politically correct."

She added: "It is very sad because it is part of the fun of bingo but unfortunately in today's society people take it literally."


Well here's my response to the above article " What a load of Bollocks ! "

Not very politically correct though is it.

No Election until May because "We would struggle to persuade thousands of our people to go out leafleting in the cold of February and early March."


Gordon Brown has firmly ruled out holding a snap General Election in March, his closest allies have revealed.

The PM had been under pressure to capitalise on new figures which are expected to show the British economy has emerged from the recession, by going to the polls on March 25.

Although the figures are not to due to be published until late January, Labour strategists are confident they will show the downturn is over.

But Mr Brown's key allies have disclosed a March election is "simply not going to happen."

They insist the PM is focusing his intention on May 6, which is "very much the favoured polling date."

Mr Brown has also called on ex-Cabinet minister David Blunkett to help Labour raise an election war chest of up to £20million for the campaign.

The pair will help spearhead a major internet fundraising campaign in the New Year as they fight to match the fortune pumped into the Tory machine by mega-rich backers such as billionaire businessman Lord Ashcroft.

Labour strategists say their battle plan is to raise as much cash as possible ahead of a May election.

One senior source said: "We would struggle to persuade thousands of our people to go out leafleting in the cold of February and early March."

"Everything is geared up towards an election in May. Most of the gossip about a March date was spread by David Cameron and the Tories in a failed attempt to destabilise us."

The latest possible date for a General Election is June 3.

Mr Brown will also start the New Year with a tour of key election battlegrounds in the south of England. He plans to summon his ministers to a regional Cabinet meeting in Exeter - one of the key seats the party needs to win at the next election.

Mr Brown also moved to dismiss rumours of any divisions between himself and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "They speak to each other all the time. It's utter nonsense to suggest there's a rift between Gordon and Peter."

Source http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/12/27/gord-snap-march-poll-is-off-cards-115875-21924576/

So where have Neath and Port Talbot BNP been since September 2009.

Glyncorrwg,Blaengwynfi,Abergwynfi,Margam,Margam Village,Cymmer (part of more to come ),Pontrhydyfen,Taibach,Fairfield,Sandfields,Baglan Moors,Aberavon and Port Talbot.

We have spoken to hundreds of people and delivered over 8,000 thousand leaflets.

We have not finished yet.

Whenever the "Traitor " Brown decides to call a General Election we will be ready !

See you out and about no matter how cold it is.

Kevin and team

Saturday, 26 December 2009

The whole of Afghanistan and Iraq were never worth the death of one British Soldier or one tear from a grieving parent !



Only the British National Party will bring our troops home from these " ILLEGAL WARS" not tomorrow,not next year or next Christmas but TODAY.
Kevin

Thursday, 24 December 2009

The High Street Banks cannot be allowed to continue to " rip off " the most vulnerable in society with excessive Bank Charges



The Office of Fair Trading's cowardly decision to drop its investigation into the extortionate overdraft charges made by major banks is extremely disappointing.

It is a blow for many millions of bank customers from the poorest and most vulnerable in our society.

As a nation and as individuals we have already been burdened with additional debt for many years to come by bailing out the Banks and Banksters who took reckless decisions with "our money" in order to earn vast bonuses.

Enough is Enough.

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

So what exactly do "Failed Asylum Seekers " have to do before this government will deport them ?


Amy Houston Aged 12

A failed asylum seeker who fled after knocking down and killing a 12-year-old girl has won his appeal to stay in Britain.


The family of Amy Houston, who was left dying under the wheels of Aso Mohammed Ibrahim's Rover car as she walked to the shops, have spoken of their disgust at the decision.

The Kurdish Iraqi was on bail and already disqualified from driving when he hit the schoolgirl.
Ibrahim, 32, who has never held a driving licence, was jailed for four months for driving while disqualified and failing to stop after an accident.

Now the father-of-two has won a court appeal against him being deported.


Amy's father Paul said: 'They may as well give passports out in lucky bags because that is all they are worth.

'I cannot believe the judge's decision and that he thinks it is right for him to stay here. Is he on another planet?'

Justice Secretary Jack Straw has pleaded to take the case to Home Secretary Alan Johnson in an attempt to force an appeal.


Mr Houston, 39, from Darwen in Lancashire, said:"'It was very difficult for me to go to the hearing and stand 10 feet away from the man who killed my daughter."


"If I thought he was genuinely sorry, I would have stood up in court and said I didn't want him to be taken away from his children."
"I know what it feels like to have your family broken up, but the fact that he has got to stay is an absolute travesty."
"It's the best Christmas present he could wish for and a terrible one for my family."


"Where is the justice in that?'

He added: "I will fight this decision for the rest of my life - or until he leaves the country. I owe Amy that much."


Weeks before killing Amy in November 2003, Ibrahim had been banned for nine months for driving while disqualified, without insurance and without a licence.

Amy Houston was outside her home when she was knocked down.


Ibrahim was approaching traffic calming measures when a boy ran across the road, and Amy followed running into the path of Ibrahim's car.


The youngster, who lived with her mother Joanne Cocker, had to be freed from underneath the vehicle by firefighters.


She was still trapped under the car when Ibrahim jumped out of the vehicle and ran off.

A police officer drove the ambulance to hospital so both paramedics could treat Amy but despite their efforts she died in hospital later that day.

After the accident Ibrahim confessed to a friend, who took him to a police station where he owned up.

Ibrahim, of Blackburn, had exhausted all his appeals to stay in Britain but was allowed to stay because Iraq was unsafe.


He has since married a British woman called Christina and now has two children.

In 2006, he was again convicted of driving while being disqualified.


Fourteen months ago he was taken to a deportation centre and UK Border Agency officials vowed they would try to deport him 'at the earliest opportunity'.

But he was later released on bail and an appeal against the deportation began on the grounds he had married a British woman and they had two children.

Mr Houston added: 'Why should he be allowed to walk free after what he has done?


'I need to carry on fighting because I don't want anyone else to find themselves in this position and I don't want anybody else's kid to get killed.


'He's just laughing at the British justice system. It is so wrong.


"Where is the justice for my Amy?"



The NHS is on the point of collapse and here's why you can never get an appointment when you need one !



The liberal lie that “immigration is good for the NHS” has been exposed once again with the news that the health service is on the point of collapse as one new immigrant patient registers for its services every minute — and you pay for it.


According to a report compiled by independent think tank Migrationwatch, immigrants are registering with a GP for free healthcare at a rate of more than one every minute.


The report showed that 605,000 people who arrived from overseas registered with a doctor in England and Wales last year. This was an increase of over 50 percent in just seven years.


In its report, Migrationwatch said that this places a “significant strain” on services and could force patients to wait longer for appointments and treatment.


In addition, the invasion is further exacerbating the already critical shortage of funds in many NHS trusts — one more example of the taxpaying British people being put last.


According to the report’s conclusions, made after a study of official data provided by NHS Trusts, 536,000 of the 605,000 new registrations were migrants, while the rest are likely to have been Britons returning from overseas.


In his commentary, Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green, said: “This amounts to an open door to primary care which can also lead to access to secondary care.


“The Government has been dithering while the NHS has been struggling to cope with the extra numbers resulting from mass immigration."


“In present financial circumstances it is surely obvious that we do not have the resources to cope with the extra ten million people now officially projected over the next 25 years — seven million as a result of immigration.”


The insanity of the situation is aggravated by the fact that there are currently no checks in place to determine if a patient is entitled to free healthcare or not.


Apparently doctors have discretion to register who they please, which, given the Hippocratic Oath which obliges them to help anybody, puts personnel in an impossible situation.


Dr Richard Fieldhouse, of The National Association of Sessional GPs, was quoted in the media as saying that many of the newly registered immigrants spoke little or no English which added to appointment times.


He said: “We have to draw diagrams. It takes probably 25 to 30 minutes. We want to do everything we can for them.”

Matthew Elliott, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, was quoted as saying that it was “clearly unacceptable that someone who has paid for the NHS throughout their working life should face delays or queues as a result of recent immigration.”



According to a 2005 report in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, more than 84 hospitals in California have had to close after they were overwhelmed by illegal immigrants who used the services without contributing.


“The influx of illegal aliens has serious hidden medical consequences,” wrote Madeleine Pelner Cosman, author of the report.

Vulnerable Pensioners abandoned this Christmas by New Labour

PENSIONERS will get a paltry £10 Christmas bonus this year.

It is the SAME amount OAPs were paid when it was first launched in 1972.


Chancellor Alistair Darling was last night branded a Scrooge after slashing the annual sum - which was last year raised to £70.

The £10 Christmas bonus first introduced in 1972, under ex-Tory PM Ted Heath, would be worth about £98 at today's prices - TEN times more than this year's bonus.


That would also be worth more than the basic pension of £95.25 a week.


Added to the fact that New Labour intends to abolish attendance allowance and disability living allowance for the most vulnerable in our society affecting 114,000 people in Wales the £10 Christmas bonus comes as no surprise.

We should start paying the Christmas Bonus every year at it's true worth (£98.00 this year ) and continue to do so and it would be linked to inflation.

We should also shelve plans to abolish "Attendance allowance " and " Disability Living Allowance. "

New Labour is a disgrace and should be voted out.

Saturday, 19 December 2009

Tory Shadow Cabinet to pay back £250,000 in " Fiddled Expenses."


Tory,Labour,Liberal or Plaid they are all a bunch of robbing, thieving, lying scum !

Source http://bnp.org.uk/2009/12/the-thieves-who-would-be-government-tory-shadow-cabinet-to-replay-250000-in-swindled-expenses/

The criminal gang of Tories masquerading as the Shadow Cabinet has now been ordered to collectively repay £250,000 in fraudulent “expenses” claimed out of the pockets of the long-suffering British taxpayer.

The latest estimate of the total amount of money swindled by the Tory leadership in the ongoing parliamentary expenses scandal was revealed after Shadow defence secretary Liam Fox was forced to pay back £7,984 in mortgage interest, repairs and council tax. His total repayment to the taxpayer now stands at £12,279.20.

Other Tories are to repay a further £24,800 in what has been described as “overpaid expenses claims,” (in plain English, money fraudulently claimed from the taxpayer) bringing the total repayments by the Shadow Cabinet to more than £70,000.

No less than 13 members of David Cameron’s shadow cabinet have paid back fraudulent expenses identified as “excessive” by Sir Thomas Legg’s audit of MPs’ allowances.

In total, that disgraceful party’s MPs have now paid back more than £250,000 in claims since the expenses scandal first became public.

Patrick McLoughlin, Tory Chief Whip, was asked to repay £4,058.54 covering cleaning bills and mortgage interest.

Caroline Spelman, the shadow Communities Secretary, was asked for an additional £2,167.51 for cleaning, utilities and telephone bills. She has now returned £2,635.

Andrew Mitchell, the shadow International Development Secretary, faced a demand for £2,673.33 he claimed towards council tax and mortgage interest.

The shadow Business Secretary, Kenneth Clarke, is returning £1,345 for cleaning bills after successfully disputing a demand to pay back £4,733 for gardening and cleaning.

Cheryl Gillan, the shadow Welsh Secretary, is paying back £1,884.23 in mortgage interest claims.

William Hague, the shadow Foreign Secretary, is returning £601.14 in mortgage interest.

Owen Patterson, the shadow Northern Ireland Secretary, is giving back £281.19 covering mortgage interest, council tax and repairs/maintenance. His total repayment as a result of the Legg investigation stands at £5,229.15.

Andrew Lansley, the shadow Health Secretary, is returning £877.56 for furniture, repairs and mortgage, taking his total repayment to


Meanwhile it has been reported that police investigating the abuse of parliamentary expenses have uncovered four cases that are so serious that they have been referred to prosecutors with the aim of criminal court cases.

The identities of the four parliamentarians, who come from both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, have not yet been revealed.

The Metropolitan Police said “a small number” of further cases were still being investigated.

There have been no arrests during the investigation, although some people have been interviewed under caution.

End

Kick out the " Pigs in Troughs " at the General Election by voting BNP !

Kevin

Thank you New Labour ! Unemployment rises and more youths than ever are out of work

YOUTH employment reached a record high yesterday as new figures showed the number of people without jobs in the UK has risen to its highest level in nearly 15 years.

Nearly 2.5m people are now out of work across the UK – an increase of 21,000 on the last quarter.

Of those, 9,000 are in Wales, representing 40,000 of the total.

Across Britain, the number of 16 to 24-year-olds out of work was 952,000 in the three months to October, a quarterly rise of 6,000 – and the highest figure since records began in 1992.

Total unemployment increased by 21,000 to 2.49m, the highest level since early 1995, although the quarterly rise was the smallest for 18 months. The UK’s unemployment rate has now reached a 13-year high of 7.9%.

The sad truth is that these figures show Wales is coping worse than the rest of the UK and in turn, the UK is coping worse than the rest of the world.

Unemployment among the under-24s is now running at more than 18%.


More than one in five working-age people are now economically inactive, including those who are claiming incapacity benefit.

The over-50s are also being hit hard by the recession, with many of those made redundant struggling to find new work.

The ONS data showed 620,000 people across the UK had been out of work for more than a year, the highest total since 1997.

Men in their 50s are being hit hard by the recession, with the number of long- term unemployed men over 50 nearly trebling over the past year.

Employers’ ageist attitudes mean many older workers simply aren’t getting the opportunities to return to employment, and research shows the longer it takes, the more unlikely it is they will ever get back to work.

An end to the working lives of men in their 50s will not only condemn them to an uncomfortable retirement, but will also deprive the recovering economy of their skills and experience, just when they are most needed.



British Jobs for British Workers. 

Wednesday, 16 December 2009

700 Valium tablets destined for kids are seized by police. Only the BNP has a Zero Tolerance Policy on drugs !

POLICE have swooped in the Afan Valley following fears that drugs were being dealt to youngsters.

The operation in Cymmer resulted in about 700 Valium tablets being seized.

It also led to a 26-year-old man being arrested on suspicion of being concerned in the supply of controlled drugs. He is currently on police bail pending further investigation.

A police spokesman said there had been concern about the supply and use of Valium in the area.
"Police have carried out a number of search warrants across Port Talbot," he added.

The spokesman confirmed that around 700 blue tablets — believed to be Valium — as well as cash and drugs paraphernalia were also recovered during the operation.

Detective Inspector Dave Wright, of the Neath Port Talbot Police pro-active team, said they had acted on information from the public.

"Since we appealed to the public regarding the supply of Valium, we have received a lot of information from residents who are concerned," he said.

Mr Wright added: "We are concerned at the number of individuals, especially youngsters, who have been brought into police custody for committing criminal offences who show serious effects of taking drugs."

He said that after taking these tablets, the young people could not remember where they had been or what they had done from one day to the next.

"In some cases they are completely unaware of what criminal acts they have committed," he said.

Neighbourhood Sergeant Cheryl Griffiths said the communities of the Afan Valley were 100 per cent behind the drug crackdown. ( And so am ,Kevin )

"The origin and make-up of the Valium is not known and therefore those who are taking it are putting themselves at risk of serious ill health or even death," she said.

"I would ask parents to look out for any unusual or incoherent behaviour and to contact the police should they have any concerns."

Anyone with information should contact Neath Port Talbot Police on 01639 634300 or Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Source http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/southwalesnews/700-Valium-tablets-destined-kids-seized-police/article-1612166-detail/article.html

To view the British National Party policies on Crime and Justice click on the link below.

http://bnp.org.uk/policies/law-and-order/

Kevin

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

Suspected terrorist-linked cell checked out Bridgend shopping centre


A SUSPECTED al-Qaida-inspired cell were caught red-handed checking out potential terrorist targets, including a Bridgend shopping centre, police said today.

Senior officers said the Algerian gang might have been employed to prepare the ground for an atrocity.
City of London Police released chilling footage recorded on one man's mobile phone as he travelled around London.

It showed the man examining Oxford Circus, Mornington Crescent and Camden Town Tube stations.

Extensive footage was also recorded at Liverpool Street railway station and at the Broadgate Circle shopping and restaurant plaza.

Police inquiries later revealed the gang also visited shopping centres in Hatfield, Hertfordshire, Bluewater in Kent and Bridgend.

Five men were arrested in a series of raids in July last year after one man was caught filming and acting suspiciously at Liverpool Street.

Two men were subsequently convicted of a huge mobile phone and luxury goods fraud racket and deported after serving prison sentences.

The footage was released today in response to a surge of criticism of police for stopping and searching people taking photographs at tourist hotspots.

It had been claimed police were misusing terrorism legislation to target tourists, photographers and the media in general in busy public places.

Detective Superintendent Chris Greany, head of counter-terrorism at City of London Police, said the men might have been a fundraising and research arm of an al Qaida-linked group in North Africa.

He said the seized footage was now used to train police and community support officers across England and Wales about the signs of potential terrorist activity.

Mr Greany said: "Hostile reconnaissance footage is a tradable commodity within terrorist circles.
"The actual attack team do not have to expose themselves to the risk of being disrupted."

"We want to set a balance between the challenges of policing and legitimate photography by tourists and the media."

The senior officer added that he would rather be explaining the intrusive tactic of stop and search than explaining how terrorist preparations went unnoticed.

Mr Greany added: "All this activity took place just before they went back to Algeria, so a reasonable assumption is there has been some tasking and they are taking it back.

"Why would you film yourself taking a photograph unless you had to show someone you were doing it?

"Maybe there was a payment from someone who wanted it."

Assistant Commissioner Frank Armstrong said preventing terrorism remained one of the top priorities for all police forces.

He said: "One of our main priorities is clearly counter-terrorism.

"We train our officers and encourage them to do a lot of stop and search.
"But I would argue we have got the politest police force in the country."

Vote BNP

Saturday, 12 December 2009

So how would a Sandboard work ?


Cheap and effective in stopping sand from the beach entering the housing estate.
Neath Port Talbot Council once again sort it out !
Simple.
Kevin

Friday, 11 December 2009

South African Terrorist Peter Hain tops local league of MP expenses claims and Hywel Francis claims £835 for repairs to his bathroom at our expense


Where's the £103,000 in donation money gone Peter? We are still waiting for your answer.

The following is taken from http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/southwalesnews/Peter-Hain-tops-local-league-MP-expenses-claims/article-1599660-detail/article.html


THE latest details of second home claims made by South Wales's MPs were published at Westminster yesterday.

The documents released online mainly covered the period before May this year, when a national newspaper published details of previous claims that sparked public outrage.

Among the highest local claimers in the last financial year was Neath MP and Welsh Secretary Peter Hain, who claimed £22,175 last year.

He spent thousands of pounds on heating oil for his constituency home, as well as £125 for servicing and repair of his Aga. Mr Hain's claims also included occasional window cleaning bills, and £28 to fell two dangerous trees.

A spokesman for Mr Hain said: "These matters were all properly receipted."

Aberavon MP Hywel Francis claimed the maximum allowance of £24,006 to run a second home in Westminster.
Dr Francis's mortgage interest payments were £1,262 a month, and he also made a claim of £835 for repair work carried out in his bathroom.( Not mentioned in the article is that he also claimed £100 for food and £9 for drycleaning ! )

All of the claims were made within existing Commons rules.

Llanelli MP Nia Griffith made regular claims of about £900 for the mortgage on her London home.

Swansea East MP Sian James claimed £18,063. Typical claims included £1,200 in rent.
Carmarthen East and Dinefwr MP Adam Price claimed a total of £16,609, including mortgage interest on his London property.

Mr Price said: "Embarrassing and painful as this year has been for politics and politicians, I think it's been a necessary lancing of the boil."

Gower MP Martin Caton claimed £8,404 last financial year, while Swansea West MP Alan Williams claimed only £5,074.
End
"Within the rules" in my opinion is no excuse. Morally they stink !
Francis and Hain like all the rest are out to make as much as they can for themselves while their constiuencies lie in tatters thanks to New Labours financial mismanagement.

They make me sick. Shame on all of them !

Kevin

Wednesday, 9 December 2009

Bob Geldof accuses 'barbaric' family courts of 'kidnapping children

Bob Geldof today accused the secretive family courts of 'state-sanctioned kidnap.'

The pop star turned campaigner said the 'barbaric' family law system wrecked the lives of children and their families.

He spoke as he launched a report that severely criticised the way family courts deal with cases - particularly in which one separated parent wants to move far away from where the other lives, taking the children with them.

It said that most decisions in such cases - which are conducted behind closed doors and never become known to the public - cause children harm.

Mr Geldof said: 'In the near future the family law under which we endure will be seen as barbaric, criminally damaging, abusive, neglectful; harmful to society, the family, the parents and the children in whose name it purports to act.

'Here is one more report that empirically nails the obvious fact that to remove a child from their father (in the hugely vast majority of cases), their grandparents and other family, their school and friends, is wholly destructive to a child and its family.

'How much longer must we put up with the state sanctioned kidnap of our most vulnerable?

Because in effect that's what "leave to remove" amounts to.'

The singer's protest comes at a time of growing controversy over the workings of the family courts, which have been repeatedly blamed by fathers' groups in recent years for favouring mothers and shutting separated fathers out of their children's lives.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1234186/Bob-Geldof-accuses-barbaric-family-courts-kidnapping-children-fathers.html#ixzz0ZD8ofUQi

Sound Familiar ?

JUSTICE FOR LINDA LEWIS !

http://cllrkevinedwards.blogspot.com/2009/10/for-few-of-you-who-didnt-know-what.html

Sunday, 6 December 2009

ANGER AS BENEFITS TO ELDERLY ARE CUT

Source
http://express.lineone.net/posts/view/144371/Anger-as-benefits-to-elderly-are-cut

GORDON BROWN is facing a fresh backbench revolt over Labour plans to axe benefits for frail pensioners to pay for flagship care reform.

Thirty-five Labour MPs have signed a Commons motion calling on him not to scrap two disability benefits for the over-65s. With another 55 MPs from other parties backing the move the Government could face defeat this week.

The move comes just days after the Prime Minister was forced into an embarrassing U-turn over his plans to axe childcare vouchers for thousands of working parents in the face of a backbench rebellion.

Rebels fear plans to give free social care at home to 400,000 frail pensioners could rob a further 2.4 million pensioners of an average of £3,400 a year.

Scrapping attendance allowance and disability living allowance would save £8billion which would help pay for the new care package contained in the Personal Care At Home Bill. But Labour MPs are worried by a flood of letters in protest over the benefits cuts and more than 23,000 people have already signed a Downing Street petition urging Ministers to safeguard the allowances.

Shadow Work and Pensions Minister Mark Harper said: “We clearly have another rebellion brewing in the Labour party. This shows the deep level of dissatisfaction among Labour MPs with the half-baked policies of Gordon Brown.

“Labour’s obsession with headline chasing announcements means they consistently punish the poorest members of our society with policies made on the hoof.”

Attendance allowance, paid only to over-65s, is claimed by 1.6 million and is worth an average of £60 a week. A further 800,000 receive an average £75 a week in disability living allowance.

Typical New Labour.

Billions of pounds for corrupt overseas countries through Foreign Aid.
Pennies for the most vulnerable in our own country.

Had enough ?

Then Vote BNP !

Kevin

Related articles

http://cllrkevinedwards.blogspot.com/2009/09/carers-beware-labour-proposes-to.html

http://cllrkevinedwards.blogspot.com/2009/11/threat-to-114000-elderly-disabled-in.html



Saturday, 5 December 2009

Call to give cancer sufferers fuel bill help falls on "Deaf Ears" of this corrupt New Labour Government


The UK's refusal to extend the winter fuel allowance for people with chronic illnesses is "absolutely outrageous", a leading cancer specialist has said.

Professor Karol Sikora said sufferers facing spiralling winter fuel bills should be given urgent help.

He said patients need to keep warm to get better.

The government says its disability living allowance aims to meet year-round costs and is more generous than the winter fuel allowance.

However, critics say many cancer patients do not qualify for this benefit.

Mr Sikora, whose organisation Cancer Partners UK runs independent cancer centres, said: "You feel much colder with some chemotherapy.
"It's absolutely outrageous that cancer sufferers on treatment go home to sit in the cold for hours on end."
"We have got to do something about it and we have to do something now."

Up to 400,000 need urgent help with their fuel bills, according to the charity Macmillan Cancer Support.

Head of policy and campaigns, Michael Hobday, said: "It's important in a civilised society that the country looks after those people who're in the greatest need.

"Cancer patients undergoing treatment are twice as likely to be in fuel poverty as the rest of the population."

Fuel poverty is defined as those who spend more than 10% of their household income on heating their homes. ( There are over 5,000,000 people in our country currently suffering from Fuel Poverty - Kevin .)

The charity wants all terminally ill patients and those on some benefits to automatically qualify for the winter fuel allowance and be charged less for their energy use.

But the government has said it has no plans to extend the winter fuel payments, which are annual tax-free sums paid to people aged 60 or over.

Julian Rutter, from Crystal Palace, south-east London, had to give up his recycling business after undergoing emergency surgery for cancer of the small intestine in October last year.

"At home, I have had the heating on from early in the morning to late evening. I'm feeling the cold an awful lot more than I used to," he said.

However, he does not qualify for state disability living allowance or winter fuel payments and energy companies provide no assistance because his partner earns more than the £15,000 annual threshold.

Mr Rutter told the BBC he felt "persecuted" as a result of the lack of financial support.

Corus jobs 'not at risk' in Port Talbot after Teesside closure. Let's wait and see !

JOBS at Port Talbot's Corus plant are not at risk despite Tata's decision to mothball its Teesside Cast Products factory.

The development, which has been labelled disastrous by Community Union, means 1,700 workers in Teesside face the axe.

However, a spokesman for Corus in Port Talbot told the Post: "There is no effect on Port Talbot whatsoever and no similar or parallel announcements in Port Talbot."

The spokesman explained the plants served different markets.

"It is a different business with its own specific challenges," he said.

Thursday, 3 December 2009

Planned Jihad in Australia. At least the Australian Press is not afraid to report the truth



It does not matter which hemisphere you are in, you can always count on the moslems to behave like moslems and employ their much favoured "Asian Pack Attack".

So all you wannabee Aussies thinking about emigrating to escape the planned " Colonisation" of our country forget it.

The moslems are down under as well, so you might as well stay and fight here.

At least the Australian Press are not too "Politically Correct" to report the truth to their citizens.

Shame our cowardly,state controlled press are !

Kevin

While 1.8 million families remain on the Housing Waiting List a former asylum seeker lives in a £1.5 million home at our expense !



After almost a year since it was revealed that Toorpakai Saeidi, an Afghan immigrant mother of seven was living in a £1.2 million mansion and claiming £175,000 in benefits every year, the news has come that a Somali, Nasra Warsame and seven of her children are living in a luxurious £1.5 million home — also courtesy of the British taxpayer.

Ms Warsame’s luxurious home comes with five storeys, six bedrooms with balconies, three sitting rooms, four bathrooms and a spacious kitchen. It also sports a huge flat screen TV, designer furniture and wall length wardrobes.

All this costs you the British taxpayer £1600 a week.

Even though the home has six bedrooms, it still isn’t enough. Ms Warsame’s husband and eighth child live in a separate 2 bedroom apartment, also in London.

Meanwhile in the same week mother of two, Stephanie Lewnes her seven-year-old son Cameron and five-month-old daughter Lilly, were quite surprised when Dudley council finally handed keys to her new council home – only to be greeted by live wires hanging from the roof, boarded up windows with glass and piles of rubbish in the garden.

The contrast between these two stories shows just how much regard the liberal elite have for young British mothers like Stephanie Lewnes compared to Somalian families like the Warsames.

This comparison only proves that immigrants are indeed given priority on the housing waiting list.

British families find themselves put to the back of the housing list, simply because immigrants are fast tracked because they often have large families and are therefore given priority.

With projections that the population will grow by 9,3 million in the next 30 years to over 70 million, it’s highly unlikely that smaller British families will be getting council homes any time soon.

Figures have shown since Labour took power, council waiting lists in London have gone up by 87 percent and 95 percent in the South East. Nationally the council waiting lists have gone up by over 50 percent.

However, when faced with these figures it’s reassuring to know that the Home Secretary Alan Johnson stated in June, “I do not lay awake at night worrying about the population of 70 million. I’m happy to live in a multicultural society” — reassuring words from a man who at one time considered himself a Marxist and aligned with the extremist Communist Party of Great Britain.

Why should British families suffer at the hands of a corrupt government as a result of the failed multicultural social experiment?

The stark reality that foreigners who contribute nothing to the country and who end up in homes worth millions of pounds, will serve as a real blow to the white working class who have been betrayed, forgotten about and ignored by a corrupt party which promised twelve years ago to represent.

Personally I have never seen a Homeless Immigrant or Illegal Immigrant but I have seen plenty of our own people sleeping rough on the streets.

Kevin

Friday, 27 November 2009

Furious MP uses Parliamentary privilege to accuse council of 'kidnapping' nine-week-old baby from parents

Social workers who forced a couple to give up their 11-week-old baby for adoption have been accused of 'child kidnap' by an MP.

Staff waited until the girl's father was out before launching a raid with police at the family home to 'snatch the baby from the arms of her mother.'


Tory MP Tim Yeo used Parliamentary privilege to make the allegations in the Commons, saying Suffolk County Council had declared the couple to be unfit parents despite having no evidence of physical or emotional abuse.


'This council actively seeks opportunities to remove babies from their mothers,' he added.
'Its social work staff do so in a manner which in my view is sometimes tantamount to child kidnapping.'


In a further claim, Mr Yeo told the Daily Mail that social services became involved only because the woman's former husband had successfully sought custody of their son previously.


He alleged the ex-husband's girlfriend, who works for Essex social services, had contacted a friend at Suffolk social services and a ' spurious' concern over the mother's parenting skills was concocted around an occasion when she refused to send her son to school.


The parents, who can see their daughter only once a month on a supervised visit, now plan to flee abroad because the mother is pregnant again and is terrified the new child will also be taken away.


Using fake names to protect the family's identities, Mr Yeo said: 'Carissa and Jim have not managed their lives particularly well but that does not disqualify them from being good parents.

'The council could have provided help which would have allowed them to keep their daughter, Poppy.'

Staff started monitoring Poppy after her birth in August last year.

Heartbreak: Mark and Nicky Webster fled to Ireland with their fourth child Brandon fearing that he would be taken into care like their other children

Mr Yeo told MPs: 'The fact that no fault could be found in the physical and emotional care provided by her parents did not deter the council from destroying this fragile family.

'On October 27 last year, council staff - having ensured that Jim would be away from home - accompanied by police, arrived unannounced and snatched Poppy from the arms of her distraught mother.'


A legal battle was raging over her removal, he added, and throughout the process the council had repeatedly changed its grounds for intervening, alternating between blaming one parent and then the other.

'The first doctor's psychological assessment of Carissa declared she qualified for a diagnosis of factitious disorder [formerly known as Munchausen's by proxy],' he said.

'Then a consultant forensic psychiatrist, after the briefest of assessments, decided that she fulfilled the criteria for the much more catch-all narcissistic personality disorder.

'The first doctor assessed that Jim was 'a pathological liar' but later a consultant clinical psychologist 'would not endorse the expression'.

'The final favoured rationale given by social services for Poppy's adoption order was based on nothing more than the possibility of future emotional abuse.'

Simon White, director of children and young people's services, said: 'It is the welfare of the child which must be safeguarded - we reject any accusation otherwise'.

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231101/MP-accuses-council-kidnapping-child-couple-forced-new-baby-adoption.html#ixzz0Y6BcYrPd


I cannot say to much for legal reasons but how similar is this to the " Justice for Linda Lewis Case ? "

See http://cllrkevinedwards.blogspot.com/2009/10/for-few-of-you-who-didnt-know-what.html


No ones child is safe. 

Kevin

Monday, 23 November 2009

More job losses in Port Talbot. Thank you once again New Labour !

A PORT Talbot mechanical assembly firm has collapsed, owing its clients thousands of pounds.
Excel Assemblies is now in the hands of Bristol-based administrators BDO Stoy Hayward after folding earlier this month.

The firm, which was run from a site on the Baglan Industrial Park, produced cables, wiring harnesses and cable management systems for clients including Airbus and defence contractor BAE systems.

Excel had hoped for a boost in business in April this year when it secured a £350,000 loan package backed by the Assembly which had the potential to double its turnover to £10 million and increase staff from 60 to 100.

But it went into administration on Tuesday, November 3, owing thousands of pounds in unpaid bills to clients including American engineering firm Abbatron.

The company had been shipping custom designed waterproof electronic connectors used in military applications to Excel until earlier this year.

British Jobs for British Workers !

Sunday, 22 November 2009

British People Put Last Again. £1 million Flood Relief to Cumbria,but £293 million in Foreign Aid in the same week.Disgraceful !



In the same week that Gordon Brown announced £1 million in flood aid to Cumbria, the Department For International Development gave out an incredible £293 million in foreign aid to Sri Lanka, Pakistan, the World Bank, Sierra Leone and Ethiopia.

The flash floods in Cumbria came after England’s wettest day on record.
They caused chaos, damaging more than 1,400 homes and shops and sweeping away bridges.
One policeman, PC Bill Barker, 44, was swept away while directing motorists away from Northside bridge when it collapsed.

The £1 million “aid” to Cumbria announced by Mr Brown was given much publicity by the controlled media in an attempt to show “how much he cares.”

Meanwhile, the same media have refused to give any publicity to this week’s press releases from the Department For International Development (DFID) which announced the following foreign aid grants on their website:

- 21 November 2009: £1 million given to the International Organisation of Migration to provide transport, shelter, clean water and sanitation for Sri Lankans involved in a civil war in that country;

- 19 November 2009: £34 million in aid to Pakistan to “rebuild businesses and agriculture for millions of people” in that country. The money will be spent in the North West Frontier Province, and South Waziristan in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas. It includes £2 million in new aid to South Waziristan to improve water and health facilities for more than 1.2 million people.
The DFID press release also proudly announces that Mr Brown recently announced an additional £10 million in aid to “help rebuild infrastructure, stimulate the economy and improve local agriculture.”

- 19 November 2009: £1.5 million in aid was given to the World Bank’s Global Road Safety Facility to “make roads safer and improve driving skills in some of the world’s poorest countries.”

- 18 November 2009: £34 million was given to help fund healthcare in Sierra Leone.

- 18 November 2009: £172.5 million aid package given to “provide humanitarian relief” in Ethiopia.

- 15 November 2009: £40 million given to the Nepalese government’s National Forestry Programme which will “ give Nepalese communities ownership of the thousands of hectares of forest currently under government control, helping some of the world’s poorest people to earn an income from their natural resources.”

The Conservative Party has promised to double foreign aid should it come to power. At the same time the Tories have promised domestic cutbacks to help “balance the budget.”

British people are always put last by the Lib-Lab-Con alliance.

Saturday, 21 November 2009

Labour funded " Research Unit " deliberately falsified data over the " Climate Change Theory."




The “climate change” theory has taken a hammering with new revelations that a Government-funded research body deliberately falsified data and tried to suppress the news that the earth’s temperature has actually been stable for the past ten years.

The latest revelations — released after an illegal email and data hack into computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (known as Hadley CRU) — indicates that scientists involved in propagating the “climate change” theory have resorted to lies, distortions, cover-ups and smears of opponents, to “prove” their theory.

The “climate change” theory has been used as a political tool against industrialised nations to increase taxes and subsidies to the Third World as “compensation.”

For example, as recently as last week, one Suneeta Mukherjee, country representative of the United Nations Food Population Fund (UNFPA), claimed that “climate change” was responsible for women in the Philippines turning to prostitution.

“The effects of climate change have driven women in communities in coastal areas in poor countries like the Philippines into dangerous work, and sometimes even the flesh trade,” Ms Mukherjee said.

The leaked emails, from some of the most prominent scientists pushing the “climate change” theory, indicate how they have used “tricks” to cover up holes in their data.

Allegations over “climate change” have been used in recent years to make all manner of outrageous demands for compensation from the West’s taxpayers.

It has even been used as an excuse why Europe should be obliged to accept “climate change refugees” from the Third World.

The latest revelations will add fuel to the fire of those of us who consider the entire theory to be bogus and politically motivated.

Once again another Labour lie cynically invented for their own political ends. Vote them out !



Kevin

Monday, 16 November 2009

Will the "South African Terrorist" Peter Hain now call the Irish Government " Fascist and Racist " for adpoting BNP policy ?



Last week, the Irish government formally launched a voluntary repatriation programme for immigrants and asylum seekers in Eire, offering them cash incentives to leave that country for good.

An Irish government spokesman said that the scheme will only apply to non-EU nationals living in Eire and would see the Justice Department spend almost €600,000 this year to pay for immigrants and their families to return to nations outside the European Union.
“The grants will not be given to individuals but rather the scheme will operate through projects and organisations,” the spokesman added “They [immigrants] can apply for the fund only through organisations and community groups. It is the first time we have introduced the scheme.”
The scheme was kicked off last Friday with advertisements in national newspapers in Ireland advising immigrants of the offer.
Application forms will also be available for non-EU nationals in the main immigration centre on Burgh Quay, Dublin.

According to official figures, up until the early 1990s, Ireland was 95 percent white and Catholic.
Ireland’s inhabitants are “non-nationals.” Most of them are from Eastern Europe, China, Brazil and west Africa or are British citizens who have settled on the island.
Some academics, such as Dr Bryan Fanning of University College Dublin, estimate that the real figure is more than 20 percent.
In either case, it means that one fifth of Ireland’s population is not Irish.

According to press reports, there is increasing anxiety in Ireland over this steady swamping of that nation.
Several days ago, the mayor of Limerick, Kevin Kiely, publicly called for the deportation of EU nationals who were out of work for more than three months and were claiming social welfare benefits.
“We are borrowing €400 million per week to maintain our own residents and we can’t afford it,” Mr Keily said, much to the consternation of Ireland’s liberals."

A voluntary repatriation programme by itself will not accomplish the goal of keeping Ireland Irish.
In addition to that incentive, the core of the problem must be addressed, namely the reasons why immigrants are coming in the first place.
The following steps, which apply to all First World nations, need to be implemented:

1. Ireland should be declared a non-immigration country, with exceptions granted in only the most extra-ordinary cases.

2. Ireland should commit to accepting genuine asylum seekers fleeing persecution only if Ireland is the nearest first safe country to the refugees’ country of origin.

3. Ireland should launch a comprehensive crackdown on all illegal immigrants and deport these lawbreakers back to their countries of origin without compensation.
4. The Irish government should formally announce that it is their intention to institute further policies which are designed to guarantee that the majority population in Ireland remains Irish.

Sunday, 15 November 2009

£13 Billion a year. The cost of Immigration to the British Taxpayers !


Criminal immigrants held in British jails cost the taxpayer £283 million per year, new figures have revealed.
This means that the annual total cost of immigration to the British taxpayer is now set at just over £13 billion per year.

According to official figures revealed in Parliament, the bill for keeping foreign prisoners in British jails has been £3.4 billion since 1997.
This equates to £283 million per year.

According to figures compiled earlier by Oxford Professor of Demography, David Coleman, and released by independent think tank Migrationwatch, immigration already costs the British taxpayer some £12.8 billion per year.

This figure does not include the cost of housing and feeding foreign prisoners generated by the imprisonment of 11,350 foreign convicts in Britain’s overcrowded jails.

Foreign prisoners have taken up 48 percent of all new jail cells built since 1999, the parliamentary figures also revealed.
Some 12,549 new jail cells have been built in the last ten years, while the foreign inmate population grew by 5,962 over the same period.

When the foreign inmate cost is added to Professor Coleman’s figures, the total cost per year ramps up to the £13 billion figure.

This is ten times the National Health Service Deficit and 40 percent more than the foreign aid budget.

The number of foreign criminals has increased by over 110 percent since 1999, compared to an increase of 20 percent in UK offenders. Of the latter number, statistics show further that large numbers are from first or second generation immigrants.

According to figures from the Office of National Statistics, immigrants also send home about £4 billion a year in remittances back to their home countries.

The £4 billion figure is thought to be an underestimate, as it does not include money sent from Britain by unofficial banking channels.
In contrast, just £2.3 billion a year flows into the country from British ex-pats working overseas.

A House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs last year found “no evidence” to show that net immigration generates significant economic benefits for the existing UK population.

The latest set of figures show even this to be somewhat of an understatement.
Source BNP main website http://www.bnp.org.uk/

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Britain is Bankrupt and so is the Labour Party

LABOUR is facing an election crisis after being banned from spending extra money on campaigning.

The party has been forced to make drastic cutbacks after expected donations failed to materialise.

It is under strict orders from its banks not to increase spending, despite the looming general election.

Labour MPs defending marginal seats complain they have been “fobbed off” with “DIY tool kits” to make their own campaigning materials and have received no other support from party headquarters because of the cash crisis.

Labour’s banks have imposed a recruitment freeze on head office, and the party is operating just 20 of the 80 telephone lines it usually runs at its call centre in the months leading up to an election.

In a desperate move, Ray Collins, the party’s general secretary, tried to “seize” the party’s multi-million-pound property portfolio, made up of buildings owned by local branches around the country, in order to borrow against it.

However, his attempt was thrown out by members of the party’s ruling body, the NEC, who feared the assets might be at risk.

Labour’s dire financial situation has led to speculation that Gordon Brown could call the election earlier than May.

“We just can’t afford a long campaign,” an insider said.

source http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6908003.ece

Sunday, 8 November 2009

Liars,Buggers and Thieves. From Animal Cruelty to Vote Rigging.


The website link below catalogues just some of the many serious crimes carried out by serving and former elected representatives of the Old Gang Trio of the failed political parties representatives.


A favourite trick of liberal-leftwing interviewers and the state controlled press when losing an argument with BNP spokesmen is to start banging on about “BNP criminals.”


Well, as Anne Winterton pointed out in The Sunday Times, this really isn’t a very honest thing to do when not mentioning the fact that a very small number of BNP criminal records (mainly the result of political persecution, self-defence against leftist thugs and youthful stupidity now twenty years or more in the past) need to be put into the context of the far worse, more numerous and more recent crimes of many members of the old parties.


Lets not for get how our own Members of Parliament have stolen tax payers money for years with their expenses fiddles and not one of them have been prosecuted.
There are many examples listed of how elected representatives of the corrupt,lying and useless old failed political parties act when they are voted into office.
Sadly the biased and twisted press rarely report their actions.
Enjoy
Kevin

Saturday, 31 October 2009

How can Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council be considered democratically run when

Every committee that exists is run by a Chairman and a Vice Chairman from the corrupt New Labour Party.

No representative from any other party has any influence on any of the committees.

Democratic NO.

Dictatorial and unrepresentative YES.

If elected I would call for an urgent Independent Investigation into the sinister workings of Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council.

Kevin

Saturday, 24 October 2009

Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser

Taken from the Daily Telegraph Saturday 24/10/09

Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the "major shift" in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: "Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

"I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn't its main purpose – to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date."

The "deliberate policy", from late 2000 until "at least February last year", when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.

Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.

On Question Time on Thursday, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour's immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.

In his column, Mr Neather said that as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a "driving political purpose" behind immigration policy.

He defended the policy, saying mass immigration has "enriched" Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.

But he acknowledged that "nervous" ministers made no mention of the policy at the time for fear of alienating Labour voters.

"Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom."

"But ministers wouldn't talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn't necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men's clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland."

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: "Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite."

"Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock up but also a conspiracy. They were right."

"This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage."

The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: "We welcome this statement by an ex-adviser, which the whole country knows to be true."

"It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain."

A Home Office spokesman said: “Our new flexible points based system gives us greater control on those coming to work or study from outside Europe, ensuring that only those that Britain need can come."

“Britain's borders are stronger than ever before and we are rolling out ID cards to foreign nationals, we have introduced civil penalties for those employing illegal workers and from the end of next year our electronic border system will monitor 95 per cent of journeys in and out of the UK."

“The British people can be confident that immigration is under control.”

END

At last the truth is out !

For years that the population of the UK has been " Socially Engineered " by the Labour Party and the others to produce a " multicultural nightmare " against the will of the British people and " WITHOUT OUR CONSENT ! "



source http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html


Wednesday, 14 October 2009

New Labours Anti British Employment Policies are working.This means that we are not !


Jobless figures hit 16-year high

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8306611.stm

Unemployment in Wales rose by 24,000 in the three months to August, bringing the total figure to 130,000.

The latest figures show that the jobless rate has gone up by 1.6% during the quarter, which is by far the biggest increase in the UK.

That means the unemployment rate in Wales now stands at 9.1%, with only the west Midlands and the north east of England higher.

The last time unemployment in in Wales was this high was in 1993.

Across the UK the figures rose by 88,000 to 2.47 million.

British jobs for British Workers. 

Thursday, 8 October 2009

For the few of you who didn't know what the " Justice for Linda Lewis Campaign " is all about. Well here is the sickening and terrifying truth !



“If God is for us, who can be against us ?” (Romans 8:31)

Bonnie Lewis Kidnapped By The State They Gagged UK Column And No2Abuse On This Story Copy And Paste It All Over The internet

Source http://www.stopinjusticenow.com/news/archive/2009/september/22/06.htm

"Bonnie Lewis Kidnapped by the State. Investigation into the scandalous abuse of a young girl by the Neath Port Talbot State Child Protection Machinery."

"For the record "Bonnie" is not the real name of this unfortunate child, now adult. The "Justice for Linda Lewis Campaign" do not want to subject her daughter to any to any further torture. We believe that Miss Lewis's daughter has suffered enough torture already at the hands of people who should have been there to help and protect her." Kevin

As Social Services get power to section parents as mentally ill - why every parent in Britain should be fighting for the safety of their children and Family Courts that are open to the full Public scrutiny.

Sick, in constant pain, and frightened after months of medical incompetence, 12 year old Bonnie Lewis was deliberately and deceitfully taken from her mother by Port Talbot Social Services.

Their aim?

Probably to meet government fostering and adoption targets, which reward Councils. And to help the NHS cover up medical blunders.

This true story is a wake-up call to every parent in UK.

Every child is now at risk of kidnappingby the State, as Social Services can manipulate the law with impunity.

Recent new draconian laws also give social workers powers to section parents who fight back as being mentally ill.

They can then be incarcerated indefinitely. Welcome to the Blair - Brown created UK soviet.

Secret and corrupt courts, mental institutions and collusion between public authorities,NHS and police.

In our June edition we printed the harrowing story of a very sick young girl called Bonnie.

Kidnapped at gunpoint by police in Florida, the US authorities had in fact been duped' by a conspiracy of lies concocted by Neath Port Talbot Social Services, Bonnie's loving mother and grandfather looked on totally helpless as their daughter was taken into care in UK.

She never lived with them again.

SS officials used falsified evidence, unlawful passports, and operated in adeceitful collusion with Hospitals, Courts, Foreign & Commonwealth Office and MPs.

Local police assisted the process.

Devious Social Services staff duped US Social Services into believing that Bonnie had beendiagnosed as suffering from Maunchausen by Proxy, and they submitted a pick up order to the US authorities, before flying to Florida to kidnap Bonnie.

Even Judge Evans, stated in his had made saying that the child should not be removed from the jurisdiction was in fact made the day after the child had in fact left the jurisdiction.

He added..and I wanted to make it abundantly clear [to the US Authorities] that I said as far as I was concerned firstly the child had already left when I made that order so it didnt seem to me that there was any breach of that order.

The judge also indicated that he only had information suppliedby Ms Rzezniczek.

The Judges words clearly indicate that Mrs Lewis and her grandfather had not breached any order in taking Bonnie to the USA.

In that case the question has to be asked - on what authority did Neath Port Talbot SS and Ms Rzezniczek obtain a passport for Bonnie, and under what authority did they then take Bonnie from her mother in the USA at gunpoint ?

Mrs Rzezniczek is now Head of Neath Port Talbot Children and Young People Services.

Her responsibilities include leading on child protection, looked after children, fostering and adoption.
Working towards closer relationships with schools and health agencies to deliver a more integrated service for children and families.

This action, taken without proper legal authority, mirrors the recent admission that Birmingham Social Services sent five children to the Jersey childrens care home without the necessary court orders.

After personal investigation, Neath Port Talbot Cllr Davies was prepared to write in a personalstatement dated 2002....I believe that we [Neath Port Talbot Borough Council] were not entitled to go there(USA), we relied on Orders that were invalid and there is a possibility that we may have misled the Courts when those original orders were made.

These are very serious allegations by Cllr Davies, but what action he took inside the Council is unclear.

Allegedly he was threatened.

The kidnap followed major medical mistakes and incompetence in South Wales hospitals.

Passed from one hospital to the next, with no diagnosis or treatment, the desperate mother eventually sought help from Social Services.

This was a huge mistake, which was ultimately to result in Bonnies kidnap by the SS.

Yet from the time that she was taken by Social Services, Bonnie remained in pain. The same pain for which her mother and grandfather had worked tirelessly to obtain a proper diagnosis and treatment.

What parent wouldnt ?

The mothers reward for her justifiable parental concern was to be branded mentally unwell and to have her child taken by the State.

In doing so,SS officials callously brushed off the daughters terror at the kidnap in Florida.


Then an ordinary social worker, Julie Rzezniczek described Bonnies trauma at being forcibly taken from her family as being....Tearful.

In the subsequent Contract for Contact, Social Services deliberately and specifically prevented any discussion between Mrs Lewis and her daughter concerning Bonnies health, illness or pain.

Letters from Bonnie all had to be given to Ms Rzezniczek before they were passed on.

Denied free speech, Bonnie did manage to smuggle out harrowing letters detailing her pain and longing to come home.

None of these were taken into account by Social Services or the Courts.

Blocked behind a Barnados guardian, this little girl was no longer permitted to show love for her family, or express her feelings.

Bonnie has still not been re-united with her mother.

Now adult, she remains held and apparently controlled in a strange world of Social Services contacts, who have aggressively blocked attempts by the family to see their daughter.

At the age of 16 Bonnie met her Grandfather in the street.

This was the man she had loved and thought the world of.

As he greeted her, she shrank back, and warned him...."Granddad, dont come near me. Theyll know. Theyll know. You mustn't."

Sensing his granddaughter's distress,and fearful for her, he walked on.

Programmed and controlled by Neath Port Talbot SS, Bonnie was now lost in a psychological prison called British child protection.

Her strange was, and still is, totally contrary to the loving letters which she smuggled to her family.

Just what did the SS do to this childs mind?

The June UK Column story ( Gagged by NPTCBC ) produced instant response from the general public.

Telephone calls from parents reporting yet more SS child snatch cases, further information on the Bonnie case (including allegations of threats by police officers), calls and letters of support for the work of the paper, demands by Port Talbot Council that they did not want more copies of the Column.

A few members of the public couldnt believe that the story was true.

And this is a critical point.

Not only is Bonnies story true, but the facts of the case are mirrored in thousands of other cases of child stealing by the state that have occurred in UK over the last 30 years.

Something evil is at work in Great Britain, and it is targeting our children.

Just consider the revelation that Birmingham Social services sent children to Jersey, and now has no record of them.

Most worryingly this is an evil backed and supported by top level government ministers using secret family courts.

The UK Column promised to continue to help the Lewis family expose the truth.

( when I saw the evidence so did I for as long as it takes ! - Kevin )
We are therefore publishing excerpts and quoting from the official documents and letters concerning the case.

Painstakingly obtained by the family, these have all been duplicated for safekeeping.

It is this evidence which must be brought into the light, if our children are to be safely brought up by their loving families, and not by an increasingly domineering and prescriptive state machinery.

The original charges made by the UK Column against Neath Port Talbot Social Servicesand local hospitals included:

Failure to diagnose a serious illness.

Removal of a healthy appendix by Neath Hospitalwith no license to operate.

Cover-up of the severe post operative abscess.

Excessive prescription of drugs, some not approvedfor use on children.

Negligent prescription of oral morphine.

Incorrect discharge and prescription forms.

Confused and incompetent hospital referrals, examination and treatment.

False denial of Bonnies pain by Doctors and Social Workers.

Instead of supporting Mrs Lewis to obtain proper treatment for Bonnie, evidence shows a number of doctors conspired with Neath Port Talbot Social Services to silence the mother by branding her mentally ill /unstable and taking Bonnie into care.

Not happy with destroying the family,Social Services then failed to treat Bonnie and left her in pain and isolated from her family.

Bonnies smuggled letters (actual handwritten ), show her trauma and ongoing pain at the hand of cold callous Social Services minders.

The following letters are in her own words.

March 19th 1998 ...they are the only things two things that I want is to be out of pain and back home with you all.

June 1998 she says (in her own words): I love my Nan and Granddad and my pain if I say it to my Mum they will stop contact never see you again. Julie Rzezniczek and the Guardian have told me I am never coming home.

September 1999....Please please help me I miss you all so mum. I hate living with Julie.I just want to be home and I am still in the same pain.

October 1999 ...”I love you Mam..All I want is to come home”.

Significantly, Julie Reznecek had contacted Dr Michael Cosgrove in May 1998 to say that Bonnie.“had some some worsening of her symptoms. It seems that a week ago her pain got worse”.

Examined by Dr Cosgrove, Bonnie was restarted on medication. As with his earlier examinations Cosgrove remained convinced that there was nothing significantly wrong.

With unbelievable hypocrisy it was unacceptable for a mother to keep seeking medical help for a daughter in pain, but Social Services can deny that pain, and then seek further medical opinion with impunity. The cold brutality is shocking.


But there is far more to Bonnie's case than brutality by the SS -the trail of medical blunders,incompetence and negligence is alarming.
Bonnie was first admitted to Singleton Hospitalon 23 November 1996 via casualty with a pulse of 140 and a temperature over 100.

Five dayslater she was discharged by Dr Dewi Evans, who considered nothing wrong.

On 9 December 1996, and still in pain, Bonnie was re-admitted to Neath General Hospital.

Although her pain was high in her stomach, a general surgeon Mr John Elias assisted by Dr Obyian performed an appendectomy.
This operation was totally unnecessary and Bonnie’s appendix was later discovered by her parents to be completely healthy.
By 16 December however, Bonnie was delirious with a massive wound infection.

Her parents discovered in January 1997 that Neath hospital did not even have a license to conduct the operation - they started a formal complaints procedure against Neath hospital.
With no diagnosis for her pain, Bonnie's parents were then given the run around by doctors and hospitals.

By 13 January Dr Nelson suspected another abscess and referred her to Bridgend hospital under Dr Trefor Jones.

Next Jones suspected a hiatus hernia.
By 20 January Bonnies supposedly had suspected ulceration problems.
After that Cardiff University hospital, and here the story takes another twist.

A Dr Morris examined Bonnie and stated that she had a serious stomach acid problem.
Although she was not his patient, Dr Morris was so concerned with Bonnie’s condition that he conducted tests which showed high acid as the cause of the pain. Prescribed anti-acid medication Bonniewas discharged.

Her pain worsened and she was re-admitted to Bridgend to be discharged and re-admitted again.

Family given run -around by NHS.

Mrs Lewis states that “No one seemed to know what was happening.

Bonnie was in pain, we just kept getting the run around.

"They lied and even falsified reports and documents.”

At the end of February Bonnie underwent yet more tests at Cardiff University Hospital.

By chance the family saw Dr Morris again.

He was shocked when they told him what had been going on, and requested from his superiors that he take Bonnie as his patient.

The family allege that not only was he refused permission, but he was warned to “keep out of it or loose his job”.
On 27 February the desperate the family contacted the Area Health Authority.

The Chief Executive Jan Williams instructed them to get in touch with their GP Dr Roberts, to tell him to get re-admitted into a hospital that had MRI scanning facilities and to have her stomach and pancreas scanned.Roberts seemed reluctant or unable to get in contact with the family, but when he finally did so, Mrs Lewis maintains that he stated.

”We’re all going to get struck off for this!”
Roberts failed to get Bonnie into a hospital with an MRI scan, and arranged Bonnie to be re admittedto Bridgend, pending transfer to an MRI facility elsewhere.

During March 1997 Bonnie was given a CT scan of her stomach, and not her pancreas.

A Dr Gregory reported that Dr Ollifee had performed a positive gastric test, and this indicated that she was suffering from Zollinger Ellison Syndrome.

Meanwhile arrangements were supposedly being made to transfer Bonnie from Singleton to Great Ormond Street hospital.

On March 30th Bonnie was prescribed 80mgs of oral morphine.
This was a gross error and luckily Mrs Lewis checked before giving it to her Bonnie.

April 1st and the desperate parents now try Alder-Hey hospital Liverpool.

Dr Dazzell examined Bonnie, repeated earlier tests, prescribed the same anti-acid medication, and then 15 days later discharged Bonnie, saying nothing was wrong.
Surreptitiously he makes a new appointment at Singleton with Dr Cosgrove. The doctor who would later be used by Social Services to ‘treat’ Bonnie.

Complaining again to Dr Avery Chief Executive of the Bro Morgannwg Health Trust in May, Avery told the surprised Lewis family that he had already allocated the money for Bonnie to go to Great Ormond Street.

He was under the (mistaken) impression she had already gone.

By personally arranging an appointment at the Royal Free, Bonnie’s Grandfather was able to get Bonnie examined by Dr Simon Murch.

He identified that Bonnie’s colon was blocked:this damning result effectively nullified earlier tests supposedly carried out at the other hospitals.
Initially upbeat about his findings, Dr Murch became cooly dismissive of his findings after ‘discussion’ with colleagues.

He prescribed laxatives, but arranged another appointment.

On June 1st Bonnie is given a Colostoscope and Endoscope. Dr Murch now diagnoses Frolic Colitis; her immune system is not working, her digestivetract is inflamed and glands in her stomach were inflamed.
He prescribed 3000mgs daily of Pentasa- a drug not recommended for children and with a recommended adult dosage of 750mgs per day.
By June 3rd a Dr Thomson suggested Bonnie had Irritable Bowel Syndrome and was depressed.
On June 5th Bonnie was given an MRI brain scan as she was having severe headaches.

From June 7th until July 17 she was subjected to yet more test by different doctors with different diagnoses.

After being an inpatient for 7 weeks Bonnie was discharged.False claims of an infected appendix.

Behind the scenes Dr Dewi Evans of Singleton Hospital had already been manipulating events.
Writing to Dr Dazell of Alder Hey Liverpool on 9 April 1997, he provides a summary of Bonnie’s case, which contains errors and untrue statements.

In particular he describes the operation to remove Bonnie's appendix as revealing an appendix that was “long and swollen”.

He also describes the recovery as uneventful apart from some “redness around the appendectomy scar.”

Either Evans was misinformed or this was a blatant lie, since Bonnie’s appendix was normal, and she had suffered a massive post operative infection and abscess of the wound.

His summary did not identify a full diagnosis for Bonnie either previously or at that time.

Instead Evans appears to ‘engineer’ his position concerning Bonnie and her family.

He states: “I have spoken to colleagues in Cardiff and Neath about Bonnie."

"They all comment on the incredible tension in the family."

"There appears to be a great deal of anger."

"However no one has worked out any explanation for these symptoms, i.e. no one can identify any “gain” to her having these pains."

"I will be very interested to see how things work out at Alder Hey."

"I would be pleased to become the local link for her pediatric care, or it may be more appropriate for her to see my colleague Dr Mike Cosgrove”.

In his letter to Dr Roberts, Bonnie's GP, dated 9 July 1997, Evans again ignores the medical shambles which has occurred since his original examination on 28th November 1996.
Clouding matters under reference to ‘the Royal Free and a whole load of investigations’, Evans again gives no definitive diagnosis, but does put himself forward as the primary point of contact within local paediatrics.

Later, this central role effectively allows him to ‘steer’ the subsequent direction of Bonnie’s case, labeling the mother with false ‘psychiatric diagnoses’ and covering up medical misdiagnosis and incompetence - the very factors which caused the family and Bonnie to experience unnecessary suffering and mental anguish in the first place.

We should also remember that the Lewis family had also started the path to a medical negligence claim, which would certainly have involved Dr Evans.
Facts twisted to claim emotional abuse.

Just three weeks later, again on the instigation of the same Dr Evans, Neath Port Talbot Social Services called an Initial Child Protection Case Conference at GP Dr Roberts’ surgery.

It was stated that .... ”(the) conference was of the view that the threshold of significant harm (emotional abuse) has been crossed, however Agencies are prepared to give the family the opportunity to work in partnership with those professionals involved in an effort to help Bonnie...(it was) therefore decided not to enter Bonnie’s name on the Child Protection Register”.

Having now drawn Bonnie into the Neath Port Talbot SS child snatch system, the conference then conspired to alienate the mother from independent medical advice.
It did this by recommendation 3... ”(that) the supervision of any medical support / intervention is undertaken entirely under the auspices of the family GP (Dr Roberts) and Consultant Paediatrician (Dr D Evans).

Any referrals to other Specialists (e.g. Psychiatrist) should occur only after positive consultation between Dr Roberts and Dr Evans”.

This recommendation effectively gave Dr Evans control of Bonnie’s case and prevented the parents from getting alternative third party medical advice.
Just four days after the conference Dr Evans again wrote to Bonnie’s GP Dr Roberts setting out what he considered were factors making him certain of “a significant psychological problem”.

His letter surmises that:

"The family taking Bonnie to Alder Hey Children’s Hospital in the middle of the night, instead of arranging admission to a local hospital..... ”could only be described as ‘attention seeking by proxy’ ”, Bonnie improved when her mother was not there.... ”suggesting a psychosomatic problem.”

The mother’s reaction to the results of various investigations ... ”is not a normal response”.The mother’s objection to psychological consultation and counceling....”is indicative of a pathological maternal response.”

It should be remembered that for some 7 months Bonnie had been in continual pain, and had already suffered further pain and suffering from a huge abscess after having her (healthy) appendix removed prior to her referral to Dr Evans.
At the end of his letter Dr Evans stresses that he considers that the conference’s decision to”channel all medical referrals through the two of us was absolutely correct”.

Most significantly he ends the letter by suggesting that “Bonnie now needs her own representative, in the form of a Guardian ad Litem”. As the appointed Court Guardian, such a person would hold near total control over Bonnie.
Evans had now effectively started to isolate Bonnie from her mother and limit access to in dependent medical opinion.
He had also started to draw attention away from physical illness (although Bonnie was still in pain) and focus attention instead on vague mental /psychiatric problems supposedly concerning the little girl and her mother.
By 24 October Evans was again promoting the need for a Guardian ad Litem -this time in a letter to Miss D Smith of Neath Port Talbot Legal Services.
He also acknowledges that the Lewis family are “employing solicitors because of their concerns over the medical management”.
At this point, possibly implicated in medical negligence, Dr Evans clearly has a vested interest in the direction of Bonnie’s case.
He next wrote to Miss Smith on 21 November 1997 making a summary of the case - again regarded by the mother as inaccurate and misleading report.
Amongst a number of points Evans significantly states in paragraph 12 that ...... ”Bonnie’s clinical presentation places her within the threshold of a diagnosis of Munchausen by proxy.”
Although not a trained psychologist or psychiatrist, Evans encloses an article he has read by Eminson and Postlethwaite titled “Factitious Illness: recognition and management.

He further recommended investigation according to routine child protection procedures.

The suggestion to appoint a Guardian ad Litem was fulfilled in December when Mrs Carol Thomas of Bernados Guardian ad Litem Service West Glamorgan was appointed.

Bonnie is kidnapped in USA at gunpoint from her hospital bed.

From this point on events snowball.

In a Court hearing at Neath magistrates court on December 18th, the Local authority asked for the case to be referred to the Family Court.
That same day Dr Evans called another case conference at Singleton Hospital because Bonnie had missed an appointment with Dr Cosgrove.

At this stage, knowing that Bonnie was still ill and in pain, and sensing that she was to be taken from them, the desperate family took Bonnie to the USA to get a definitive medical diagnosis.
They were completely entitled to do so since, as Judge Evans later admitted in court, “it didn’t seem to me that there was any breach of that order.”
Since Mrs Lewis was quite within her rights to take her child abroad for medical examination and treatment, what authority did Ms Julie Rzezniczek of Neath Port Talbot Social services have, to arrange the kidnapping of Bonnie in the USA - particularly using a label of Munchausen by Proxy, which had no substantiated medical or psychiatric diagnosis?

What legal authority did Ms Rzezniczek have to obtain a passport for Bonnie, ( under a false name ) particularly when Judge Evans had not made any ruling on her extradition from the USA?
The evidence indicates that Neath Port Talbot Social Services, in collusion with South Wales police and the Courts, acted illegally and unlawfully in obtaining a passport and kidnapping Bonnie.
On her return to UK Bonnie was placed in a psychiatric facility.
From then on she was a prisoner of the state.

Bonnie is yet to return home.

Read the excerpts on the opposite page, taken from a large selection of the letters, emails, court documentation and transcripts which provide evidence of just how Bonnie was kidnapped.( Sadly these cannot be shown for legal reasons. )

As a parent, are you appalled by what you have read?

Could the next child to be abused by the State be yours?

Write to your MP and Local Councillor.

Hywel Francis has been aware of Bonnies Case for many years but will take no action.We can only therefore assume that he is part of this sinister cover up.

On the 3rd and 5th of June 2009, five elected Councillors myself and Councillors Andrew Tutton, Keith Davies, John Tallamy and Frank Little went to court with Miss Lewis and her family in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre.
We all know that Neath Port Talbot Council have acted illegally and we were all to testify on behalf of Miss Lewis. Not one of us was allowed to do so.We were silenced by the sitting Judge Seys Llewellyn.




Also with us helping Miss Lewis with her legal case was my good friend and BNP colleague Councillor Meirion Bowen.
It is worth noting that Miss Lewis throughout her efforts for justice has always acted herself as a " Litigant in Person " No solicitor will represent her as this case is considered to much of a " hot potato " and could damage their own career prospects should they be shown to assist Miss Lewis in anyway.

Judge Seys Llewellyn is a political judge.

He was there to oppress victims of the state. He allowed endemic perjury to take place in his court in his determination to prevent Linda Lewis from seeking justice over the kidnapping of her then twelve year old daughter.
(8 signed affadavits have been sent by witnesses who attending this trial in support of Miss Lewis confirming the endemic perjury. They are now with the Lord Chief Justice Igor Judge. - Kevin )
It was proved during this case that Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council had acted illegally by kidnapping Miss Lewis daughter at gunpoint from her hospital bed in America.

They could produce no evidence to prove that as an authority they had acted Legally !

I ask you to demand that this case is brought to open trial and the guilty punished !

Kevin

A personal disclaimer from Councillor Kevin Edwards

The information that I have published in this tragic story of State Sponsored Corruption and Child Kidnapping is 100% accurate. I and thousands of people have seen the evidence and there can be no question with regards to it's accuracy.
This story is once again already in the public domain on the following websites.

http://www.stopinjusticenow.com/blog/2009/09/24/bonnie-lewis-kidnapped-by-the-state-they-gagged-uk-column-and-no2abuse-on-this-story-copy-and-paste-it-all-over-the-internet/

http://justiceforfamilies.freeforums.org/kidnapped-by-the-state-t1884.html

http://www.no2abuse.com/index.php/articles/comments/gagging-orders-in-the-uk-family-courts-whos-protecting-who/

http://www.ukcolumn.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ukcolumnjune_2008_gaggedfin.pdf

http://www.ukcolumn.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/ukcolumnoct_gagged.pdf

I would like to make it clear to all concerned that it is my decision and mine alone to publish again this tragic story. This is my personal website and has nothing at all to do with the British National Party. The opinions expressed are my own.

If any state sponsored thug is sent once again to personally intimidate me to " drop this case or there will be trouble " then this time I will be ready.

If any more threatening phone calls happen then this time I am ready to record.

Consider this there are thousands of people, good ordinary people who have known about and have been active in the "Justice for Linda Lewis Campaign " for years.


We will not go away.