You Just Couldn't Make It Up. Neath Port Talbot Children's Rights Unit launched in Neath.

The following is an article taken from The South Wales Evening Post.


A NEW project which will ensure that children and young people's rights are respected and protected has been launched in Neath.

Neath Port Talbot Children's Rights Unit is a Big Lottery funded project which aims to make the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) a reality for children, young people and their families living in the county.

Neath AM Gwenda Thomas said she very much welcomed the new unit.

She said: "The establishment of this unit clearly shows the commitment of Neath Port Talbot Council for Voluntary Services and all its partners to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and to the right of children to be respected and heard."

End

Two points to make regarding the above article,

1 - Neath AM Gwenda Thomas said she very much welcomed the new unit. Shallow words from a woman up to her neck in the cover up over the kidnapping of Linda's daughter in 1998. See Here

2 - She said "The establishment of this unit clearly shows the commitment of Neath Port Talbot Council for Voluntary Services and all its partners to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and to the right of children to be respected and heard."
.

Ok then Gwenda some facts on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) is an international human rights treaty that grants all children and young people (aged 17 and under) a comprehensive set of rights. The UK signed the Convention on 19 April 1990, ratified it on 16 December 1991 and it came into force on 15 January 1992.
.

My questions to you are very simple.

Why did you and your corrupt colleagues in the Welsh Assembly deliberately ignore Linda's daughters smuggled letters to her mother to be returned to her family ?

Does it mean that the Rights of the Child, and to the right of children to be respected and heard does not apply when covering up for your friend Dewi Evans and medical negligence ?.

I have emailed this article to Gwenda Thomas politely asking her to comment and will advise you of any reply received.

Kevin

Celebrity Criminals Like Jimmy Savile 'Were Protected By Police'

Police files on celebrities and politicians accused of sex assault were so heavily protected that officers investigating claims could not access them, it has been reported.

Information on high profile suspects was marked as 'secret' or 'restricted' and only available to a small number of officers - a system which may have helped prolific offenders like Jimmy Savile escape prosecution, The Times has said .

The approach to sensitive files was designed to stop officers from leaking information to the media.

The issue of detectives being unable to access relevant intelligence was highlighted in a report on the effectiveness of the Police National Database (PND) in the wake of the Savile scandal.

It came after complaints about Savile made to different police forces across the country while the TV presenter was still alive were not able to be shared by detectives.

Metropolitan Police Commander Peter Spindler confirmed to the newspaper that famous people were protected by high levels of confidentiality built into intelligence systems.

He said: "Any high-profile or sensitive case will be restricted on our systems because we are not going to let 50,000 people (Met officers and staff) across London read sensitive material about celebrities, politicians or other high-profile people.

"We have had some officers and staff who were prepared to leak information to the media for payment and the mechanism to prevent that was to restrict access to that information."

But police believe their new PND, launched in 2011, will help prevent similar errors in the future.

The system allows sensitive material to be located but accessed only with the right clearance.

Speaking after the report was published last week Chief Constable Mike Barton, the Association of Chief Police Officer's lead on intelligence, said the current system is capable of being interrogated by any trained officer across the UK to "identify suspects, offenders and patterns of behaviour".

The National Association of People Abused in Childhood told The Times that police had put the protection of celebrities before children.

But spokesman John Bird added that he believes police are striving to "get it right in future".

The first national shared database for police in England and Wales was set up in 2003, while a later system in 2006 allowed officers to search for intelligence but restricted access to sensitive records.

Source HERE

Neath Port Talbot Social Services Exposed..The Kidnapping Of Bonnie Lewis.. UK Column Live Interview

The Unnecessary Deaths Of Children Nationwide.

The video below explains the psychological attack on our children, and the effect it is having on their minds up to and including suicide.

Premeditated psychologically motivated suicide promotion.

Former Home Of Child Murderer , Paedophile And Traitor Edward Heath To Remain Open As A Museum

Below is a letter received from Robert Walter MP in reply to a written letter expressing concern over the home of Former Prime Minister Edward Heaths Arundells remaining open as a museum.

The sickening adoration expressed in his letter of Mr Heath by Mr Walter MP is quite nauseating.

It is a well know truth that Heath was indeed a Child Murderer , A Paedophile and Committed Treason by paving the way for the sovereignty of the United Kingdom to be handed over to a Foreign Power The European Union without our consent.

For those of you interested the email address of Robert Walter MP is   robert.walter.mp@parliament.uk

More State Sponsored Child Abuse From The Perverts And Paedophiles In Power.

Children in custody were involved in 43,000 strip searches in just two years

• Illicit items were found in only 275 cases out of 43,960 strip searches
• Almost half searched were from black and minority ethnic backgrounds
• One 16-year-old girl had been ordered to hand her sanitary towel to staff

Children in custody have been stripped naked and searched more than 43,000 times in under two years.

The Youth Justice Board promised to end the routine strip-searching of children in 2011. saying the practice was undignified and led to ‘feelings of anger, humiliation and anxiety’.

But an investigation has found children were forced to strip naked on 43,960 occasions in the 21 months leading up to December 2012. Illicit items were found in just 275 cases. 

The youngest child to be strip-searched was 12 and physical force was used on 50 occasions.

Tobacco was the most common form of contraband found in the searches with no recorded discoveries of knives or drugs.

The data come from a Freedom of Investigation request by Carolyne Willow, the former national co-ordinator of the Children’s Rights Alliance for England, who described the practice as ‘institutionalised child abuse’.

She said: ‘This matter is of such magnitude that ministers must amend the rules to prescribe the extremely limited circumstances in which it would ever be permissible to make children in institutions remove their clothes and underwear.’

She added: ‘This matter is of such magnitude that ministers must amend the rules governing secure establishments to prescribe the extremely limited circumstances in which it would ever be permissible to make children in institutions remove their clothes and underwear.’ 

The statistics reveal contraband was discovered in only eight in every 1,000 searches in young offender institutions, secure children’s homes and training centres in the course of one year, and just three in every 1,000 in the next year.

Almost half - 48 per cent - of children strip-searched were from black and minority ethnic communities.

In 2006, Lord Carlile QC conducted an inquiry into the use of restraint, strip-searching and segregation in child custody.

Then, as now, fewer than one in ten searches yielded a ‘find’ and tobacco was the most common item discovered.

One 16-year-old girl told the inquiry she had been strip-searched and ordered to hand her sanitary towel to staff.

Another girl recalled: ‘When I had my first full search it was horrible as I have been sexually abused and I didn’t feel comfortable showing my body as this brought back bad memories.’ 

John Drew, chief executive of the YJB said full strip-searches should only be used following an assessment of risk and this should be the starting point for practice in all secure establishments.


He added: ‘Where providers of STCs and YOIs consider it necessary to carry out routine full searches on first admission, this approach should be justified and will be kept under review by the YJB.’

A spokeswoman for the Ministry of Justice said a revised searching policy for young people was introduced last March that ensures their safety and security while not subjecting them to a full search unnecessarily.

She said: ‘Full searches will only take place when it is necessary and there is a clear justification or identified risk.

‘We have a duty to keep any item that could endanger the safety of young people out of secure establishments. We use a number of measures to disrupt their supply and searches are an important part of this.’ 

At the end of August 2012, there were 1,643 children in custody in England and Wales. There were 1,225 in 25 Young Offender Institutions, 269 in Secure Training Centres and and 149 in Secure Children’s Homes.

Of those, 64 were aged under 14 and two just 12. The cost of keeping children in the secure estate was £268.9million.

See HERE

More Child Stealing By The State.Childrens Social Services Are A Criminal Organisation.

How a mother fell 100ft down Cheddar Gorge Cliffs and, instead of being left alone to recover from her accident, NAZI Social Services saw it as yet another chance to steal another child to be placed into 'care', in a clear attempt to line their pockets!

This woman has been up against it all... perjury, threatened with prison and, laughably, even assessed by a 'child' psychologist (all at the public's expense), which, when she questioned, was then given an adult psychologist, even though the child psychologist had done an assessment in the full knowledge that he was not qualified to do so but kept the money nonetheless!

She has randomly had her 'contact sessions' stopped with her son for the most bizarre reasons: for one, giving her son reassurance by telling him the truth that she had not given him away but that it was Social Services who took him!

Social Services are the ones that are emotionally harming children!

It is time for people to come together and stand up against this corruption and exploitation of the innocent.

One Day,One Day Soon They Will Be Brought To Account.